The U.S. Justice Department has determined that multiple layers of removal restrictions shielding administrative law judges ...

Put simply, the DOJ’s track record of public corruption cases at the Supreme Court is abysmal,’ the attorney general’s deputy ...

Ahead of Wednesday’s hearing over the potential dismissal, chief of staff Chad Mizelle critiqued the legal theory underlying ...

The Justice Department said a law protecting the officials from arbitrary removal is an unconstitutional intrusion on ...

The Justice Department on Wednesday offered a contradictory new explanation for why it is seeking to drop charges against New ...

The U.S. Justice Department has declared that removal restrictions protecting administrative law judges are unconstitutional.

Career prosecutors who recently resigned from the Trump Department of Justice (DOJ) have brought a central conflict between two views of how the agency should operate — […] ...

The federal judge considering the Justice Department's request to dismiss corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric ...

New York Mayor Adams began cooperating with Trump administration on enforcement of immigration policies after the DOJ said it ...

DOJ determined that “multiple layers” of removal restrictions “shielding administrative law judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional,” Chief of Staff Chad Mizelle says in statement.

Trump’s DOJ said the president can fire administrative law judges at will, challenging legal protections amid broader efforts to expand executive power.